Skip to content

House price-to-income ratio in Estonia

110.66

index, 2015 = 100, 2025

Moderate trust, 63 of 100 Only one source (OECD), so it cannot be checked against another.

Each source by year: index, 2015 = 100
05010015020020052010201520202025
Show the data as a table
YearOECD Analytical house prices indicators, price-to-income ratio
2005121.4
2006150.27
2007156.66
2008122.06
200983.7
201088.81
201188.24
201291.02
201391.52
2014100.13
2015100
201699.78
201797.98
201892.22
201993.01
202097.34
2021103.23
2022111.59
2023109.39
2024109.12
2025110.66

All countriesAll of Estonia's figuresCompare

Estonia among 40 countries

18 have a higher figure and 21 a lower one. Definitions differ between countries, and their years run from 2016 to 2025.

Lowest: Romania, 54.27Highest: Portugal, 166.73
What this number counts
Counts
Nominal house prices divided by nominal disposable income per head, as an index
Where
Estonia
When
Annual average of quarterly values; latest full year 2025; series 2005-2025 (yearly average over the period)

The figure from OECD, the only source that counts here.

Where the number comes from (1 source)
SourceFigure and yearDefinitionQualityCounts for
OECD Analytical house prices indicators, price-to-income ratioOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) · Official economic statisticsRetrieved 2026-10-27 · Data (API)
110.662025
Nominal house price index divided by nominal disposable income per head, index 2015 = 100.

Annual figure as published by OECD, which says annual figures are the average of the year (of seasonally adjusted quarterly values). First year from 1970 in the file: 2005 (121.4); latest full year: 2025 (110.66), a change of -8.8%.

Raw file: raw/house-prices-to-income/oecd/house_prices.csv (whole dataflow OECD.ECO.MPD:DSD_AN_HOUSE_PRICES@DF_HOUSE_PRICES(1.0), annual rows, measure HPI_YDH).

4 of 5 checks
  • Yes: Method and definitions published. OECD publishes the definitions with the dataset and in its Affordable Housing Database note HM1.2.
  • Yes: Official statistics or peer-reviewed. Compiled by the OECD from national official house price indices and national accounts.
  • Yes: Full count or representative sample. National house price indices are built from transaction or valuation records, not self-selected answers.
  • Yes: Raw data downloadable. The whole dataset is a free CSV download from the OECD SDMX API.
  • No: No known break or quality problem. OECD publishes one index per country without documenting the national source history in the data, so an unbroken method cannot be shown.
100%

Better and more direct sources count for more. A source that only copies another does not count.

  • OECD100%
How the trust score was worked out
Quality32 / 40

How well the sources are made

Agreement15 / 30

Unknown with one source, so set to half

Independence6 / 20

How many separate ways the number was measured

Freshness10 / 10

How recent the newest data is

How the score works

Who reports it, and since when

Which kinds of source measure this number, which years each one published, and where the reporting stops or has holes.

No source of these kinds: model-based estimate.

  • Single source: nothing to check it against
Years each source has a figure here
'05'10'15'20'25OECD

figure no figure here, inside its range no later figure recorded change

Why the numbers differ
  • Different measures: the price-to-income ratio divides OECD's nominal house price index by nominal disposable income per head (OECD: "the nominal house price index divided by the nominal disposable income per head"). OECD's real house price index divides the same prices by the consumer expenditure deflator, and the price-to-rent ratio divides them by the rent index. The BIS series is prices only, deflated by the consumer price index, so it is shown as its own set and never mixed with the ratio rows. (source, retrieved 2026-10-27)
  • Different base years: OECD indices are set to 2015 = 100 and BIS indices to the 2010 average = 100, so a value in one set cannot be compared with a value in another; only the movement over time can be compared. (source, retrieved 2026-10-27)
  • Shared national inputs: both bodies build on national house price indices. Computed from the two files, OECD's nominal index and the BIS nominal index keep a near-constant ratio (within 3% in every year) for United Kingdom, Germany, which points to the same national series; for Norway, United States, Canada, Sweden the two drift apart, so they use different series or splice them differently. (source, retrieved 2026-10-27)
  • Coverage: OECD says that "In most cases, the nominal house price covers the sale of newly built and existing dwellings"; the BIS lists, country by country, whether its series covers new or existing dwellings, houses or flats, and the whole country or only some cities, and how that changed over time. (source, retrieved 2026-10-27)
Common mistakes
  • Reading the index as a level: these are indices, not prices or years of income. OECD: "A comparison of nominal house prices levels across countries is difficult, as definitions differ across countries." A higher index in one country than another does not mean homes there cost more relative to income; it means the ratio rose more since 2015. (source, retrieved 2026-10-27)
  • Treating the ratio as the full cost of buying: OECD notes that "these data do not take into account the cost of borrowing", so changes in mortgage interest rates are not in it. (source, retrieved 2026-10-27)
  • Taking income per head as a typical household's income: the denominator is disposable income per head from the national accounts, an average, not a median household's income. (source, retrieved 2026-10-27)
Download, cite and report an error

From the table How have house prices changed compared with incomes in each country since 1970? Updated 2026-10-27.

Download every value in this table (CSV)

Cite as: RealStats, “House price-to-income ratio in Estonia”, updated 2026-10-27, with the original sources listed on the page.

Report an error on this page

More for Estonia on income and wealth