Skip to content

Share of homicide victims who were male in Uganda

83.9

% of homicide victims who were male (men and boys), 2024

Moderate trust, 71 of 100 Only one source (UNODC), so it cannot be checked against another.

Each source by year: % of homicide victims who were male (men and boys)
02550751002010201520202024
Show the data as a table
YearUNODC Data Portal, victims of intentional homicide, by sex
201081
201180.2
201281.8
201379.5
201481.2
201679.7
201782.4
202080.6
202182.1
202283.1
202383.1
202483.9

All countriesAll of Uganda's figuresCompare

Uganda among 133 countries

43 have a higher figure and 89 a lower one. Definitions differ between countries, and their years run from 2007 to 2024.

Lowest: Norway, 46.05Highest: United States Virgin Islands, 97.1
What this number counts
Counts
Share of intentional homicide victims who were male (men and boys)
Where
Uganda
When
2024 (one year, not an average)

The figure from UNODC, the only source that counts here.

Where the number comes from (1 source)
SourceFigure and yearDefinitionQualityCounts for
UNODC Data Portal, victims of intentional homicide, by sexUnited Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) · Police and justice recordsRetrieved 2026-10-25 · Data (Excel file)
83.92024
Victims of intentional homicide (ICCS 0101: unlawful death inflicted with intent to cause death or serious injury), all ages: male victims divided by male plus female victims, times 100, from UNODC's counts by sex.

Victims of unknown sex are left out. Counts used: 3703 male, 708 female. UNODC source codes for the two counts: CTS/SDG/NP. Only years with at least 20 male plus female victims are used, because a share built on fewer victims swings widely from year to year. Year rule: only UNODC has data for this country, so its latest year is used.

Raw file: data_cts_intentional_homicide.xlsx (UNODC, updated 12 July 2026).

5 of 5 checks
  • Yes: Method and definitions published. UNODC publishes the ICCS definition and a metadata note for the dataset.
  • Yes: Official statistics or peer-reviewed. National figures submitted by governments through the UN crime trends survey (UN-CTS) or official channels.
  • Yes: Full count or representative sample. A count of all victims recorded by the authorities, not a sample.
  • Yes: Raw data downloadable. The whole dataset is a free Excel download from the UNODC data portal.
  • Yes: No known break or quality problem. UNODC marks no adjustment or estimate for this value.
100%

Better and more direct sources count for more. A source that only copies another does not count.

  • UNODC100%
How the trust score was worked out
Quality40 / 40

How well the sources are made

Agreement15 / 30

Unknown with one source, so set to half

Independence6 / 20

How many separate ways the number was measured

Freshness10 / 10

How recent the newest data is

How the score works

Who reports it, and since when

Which kinds of source measure this number, which years each one published, and where the reporting stops or has holes.

No source of these kinds: death and health registers, independent count.

  • Single source: nothing to check it against
  • UNODC: no figure here for 2015, 2018, 2019
Years each source has a figure here
'10'15'20'24UNODC

figure no figure here, inside its range no later figure recorded change

Why the numbers differ
  • They come from two separate systems: UNODC compiles police and criminal justice records by sex of the victim, while the WHO Mortality Database counts death certificates with the cause coded as assault (ICD-10 X85-Y09) by sex of the deceased.
  • Both shares leave out victims whose sex was not recorded, so they can differ from a share of the total.
  • WHO blanks cells with fewer than 3 deaths in its files. When the counts are split by sex this happens more often, and it can move a share in small countries.
  • Where many deaths go unregistered, or many violent deaths are coded as "undetermined intent", the WHO counts can miss victims, and the missing deaths need not be split by sex the same way.
Common mistakes
  • A share of victims is not a risk. Two countries with the same male share can have very different homicide rates, and a share can change because one group's count moved while the other's stayed the same.
  • The share is about victims, not perpetrators. UNODC publishes data on suspects separately.
Download, cite and report an error

From the table Are most murder victims men or women? Updated 2026-10-27.

Download every value in this table (CSV)

Cite as: RealStats, “Share of homicide victims who were male in Uganda”, updated 2026-10-27, with the original sources listed on the page.

Report an error on this page

More for Uganda on murder and homicide